Time for an atheist on the Supreme Court?

Previously in Under God, we asked what seemed like a logical question: With the only Protestant on the Supreme Court (John Paul Stevens) retiring this summer, should the president appoint another Protestant to replace him?

But a California blogger is asking what seems to be an equally logical question: Should the president appoint an atheist -- or at least a nontheist -- to the Supreme Court? "We don't need another Protestant on the Court. Or a Catholic, Buddhist, Hindu or follower of any of the hundreds of religions that exist on this planet," wrote Tommi Avicolli-Mecca wrote for BeyondChron. "What the court really needs is an atheist."

The nine-member Supreme Court will never be a perfect demographic reflection of the United States. And of all the demographic factors involved in selecting a Supreme Court justice, religious affiliation is one that should never be considered. But what about lack of religious affiliation?

More at The Washington Post
178
jour on 08/09/2010 03:37

want to rolex watches do anything they can rolex watches to gain a victim's rolex watches trust. Using a BBB buy rolex watches logo on a website discounted rolex watch can make sales go rolex watches down so most legitimate copy rolex watch sites do not use rolex watches them even if they rolex watches are members of the rolex watches BBB. Here is an easy way to identify fraudulent sites using the BBB logo. If you click the logo and it does not go to a

Post Comment

Please Login to Post a Comment.

Forum Quick View Panel